For generations, mainstream narratives have often introduced Indigenous history at the moment another group enters the story. In the Americas, this is frequently the period when Europeans first appear. But Indigenous civilizations were already thriving, innovating, and shaping entire regions for thousands of years before that point.
This long history includes advanced agriculture, astronomy, architecture, medicine, philosophy, trade systems, and languages—developed independently over deep time. These civilizations do not require an external point of reference to define their beginnings.
Yet when educators, historians, or institutions speak about Indigenous peoples, the starting point too often remains anchored to a moment of dramatic cultural collision. This limits the richness of Indigenous history to only a fraction of its true scale.
To correct this pattern, we can use a different framing—one that recognizes complex civilizations without placing their starting point at a moment defined by conflict or upheaval.
Introducing the “Era of Mutual Presence”
Era of Mutual Presence is a term that provides a more balanced and respectful way to discuss historical periods in which different cultural groups lived in proximity or within shared regions, without centering the narrative on violence or domination.
Definition
Era of Mutual Presence:
A historical period in which two or more cultural groups existed within the same broader world or network, without defining the relationship exclusively through conflict, conquest, or oppression.
This concept does not erase or ignore moments of harm. Instead, it ensures that when we speak about ancient history, we are not unintentionally reducing entire populations to the most difficult periods of their past.
Why This Approach Matters
1. It honors the full depth of Indigenous civilizations.
Indigenous histories stretch across millennia, filled with scientific, artistic, and intellectual achievements. Beginning with deep-time developments allows these civilizations to stand on their own terms.
2. It avoids defining any people by their worst historical moment.
This applies broadly, not just to Indigenous peoples.
For example:
-
African history is not defined solely by slavery.
-
European history is not defined solely by captivity or conflict in foreign regions.
-
Asian, Pacific, and Middle Eastern histories are not defined solely by colonial encounters.
Different groups have interacted in many periods and places with complexity, trade, diplomacy, and coexistence that are rarely highlighted.
3. It provides a neutral, respectful starting point.
The Era of Mutual Presence allows historians, educators, and writers to discuss the ancient interactions of different cultures without immediately invoking trauma, unless the topic specifically requires it.
How the Term Can Be Used
The Era of Mutual Presence is ideal for:
-
Describing early cross-cultural contact in education and research
-
Writing about ancient or pre-modern societies
-
Framing Indigenous and Native American history without defaulting to conflict
-
Offering clearer, more accurate timelines for readers
-
Creating respectful and balanced public narratives
It also helps guide writers away from unintentionally implying that a civilization “began” when another entered the scene.
Conclusion
Indigenous civilizations deserve to be recognized for the full expanse of their contributions, knowledge systems, and innovations—not only at moments when another group appears in the historical record.
By using the Era of Mutual Presence, we gain a language that honors complexity without erasing pain, provides neutrality without denying reality, and restores balance to how we tell human stories.
